Oil & Gas Plans
WW is urging restraint in two big policy documents
The document that guides the White River National Forest Service’s decisions on oil and gas leasing was issued in 1993. Twenty years ago, there was essentially no drilling activity in the region, fracking and directional drilling technologies had yet to transform the industry, and Forest planners anticipated only a handful of new wells being drilled. Needless to say, their 1993 analysis is now woefully out of date.
Spurred by a series of technical filings by WW, in 2010 the Forest began the process of updating its Oil & Gas Leasing Environmental Impact Statement. In 2012, WW submitted the conservation community’s technical comments on the draft EIS, a laborious task of research, coordination and writing. (You can download this 76-page document here.) We expect the final release in May 2014.
Meanwhile, the BLM’s Colorado River Valley Field Office has just released (March 24) the final version of its Resource Management Plan. The office is responsible for 505,000 acres of public land and 707,000 acres of mineral estate in the Roaring Fork, Eagle and Colorado River watersheds. This plan will be a guiding document on where, when and how oil and gas development will occur in much of the Thompson Divide and the public lands north and south of the I-70 corridor over the next two decades. It will also establish priorities and policies for all other “resources” managed by the Colorado River Valley Field Office, including recreation and wildlife.
Although this is the “final” version of the plan, it is subject to a 30-day protest period. We are currently poring through the massive document and will publish our findings shortly. In the meantime, you can read the email alert that we sent out when the plan was released, giving our initial impressions and concerns.